 |
 |
|
|
Top 10 Migration Issues of 2008
Issue #6 — Return Migration: Changing Directions?
Depending on the country of destination and the time frame considered, 20 to 50 percent of immigrants go home or move on to a third country within five years of their arrival.
|
Would you like to see more articles on this topic?
|
|
|
December 2008
Immigration policymakers long accustomed to recruiting workers from abroad
to fuel their economies suddenly faced a much different challenge in 2008.
As the world's advanced industrial economies one by one slipped into recession,
the prospect of return migration gained currency in immigrant-receiving states
around the world.
In June, the European Union Parliament approved a directive encouraging unauthorized
immigrants to voluntarily return to their countries of origin. In September,
Spain's parliament authorized a program that effectively pays some unemployed
immigrants to leave if they promise not to return to Spain for three years
(see Issue #1: "Buyer's Remorse" on Immigration Policy ).
The trend has even spread to traditional immigrant-receiving countries, such
as the United States. In July, the US Department of Homeland Security's Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency launched a pilot program called Scheduled
Departure that allowed some unauthorized immigrants to work with ICE to schedule
their journey home. The program, however, attracted only a handful of participants
and was promptly suspended.
Some reports suggest that the global economic slowdown will encourage migrants
to return home. Malaysia's Human Resources Ministry said in October it is prepared
to provide repatriation assistance for all Malaysian workers in
Singapore who lose their jobs there.
In the United States, press reports of immigrants from Mexico or Central America
returning home due to lost jobs have become more common, but there is as yet
no statistical evidence of return (see Ones to Watch in 2009).
Some highly skilled temporary migrants in the United States and Europe may
also face the prospect of return if their employers in the banking and finance
sectors downsize or go bankrupt.
Flows to the United States appear to be slowing: the US Census Bureau's American
Community Survey (ACS) registered a net increase of just over 500,000 immigrants
between 2006 and 2007 (from 37.5 to 38.1 million). That is well slower than
the estimated 1 million net annual increase in the foreign-born population
recorded between 2000 and 2006 by the ACS and other data sources.
Of course, a certain level of return migration occurs naturally. A recent
study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) found
that depending on the country of destination and the time frame considered,
20 to 50 percent of immigrants go home or move on to a third country within
five years of their arrival.
Demographer Graeme Hugo estimates that about a fifth of all postwar permanent
immigrants to Australia subsequently emigrate from Australia and that most
of them return to their home countries.
More recently, an April 2008 analysis by the United Kingdom's Institute for
Public Policy Research estimated that about half of the 1 million workers from
the eight Eastern European states that joined the European Union in 2004 have
left the United Kingdom and returned home.
The academic literature suggests that return migration results from both failure
and success. Some migrants may decide to return because they fail to integrate
or advance in the host-country society or simply cannot find jobs.
However, most research indicates that large-scale return migration corresponds
more to political and economic conditions in the origin country. Migrants may
be motivated to return by the prospect of new opportunities at home or because
they have achieved their financial goals.
At the same time, they may choose not to return because of poor economic conditions
at home. Also, money earned in the destination country — which those at home
depend on — may give them reason to stay.
That said, having the right to return when economic circumstances change could
be an incentive to leave now.
Overall, tracking return migration remains tricky from a technical standpoint.
The United States officially stopped tracking the emigration rate of the foreign
born in 1957.
Few countries (with the notable exception of Australia) have invested in the
longitudinal data systems necessary to distinguish short-term from long-term
departure and to identify the destinations of emigrants.
In many established migration corridors between developed and developing countries
— such as between Mexico and the United States, Europe and North Africa, and
the Philippines and the Middle East — return often occurs at the end of the
migrants' life cycle as they prepare to retire.
However, Hugo's recent research on migration flows between Australia and India
and China suggests that return migrants are increasingly young and skilled
individuals in their working prime. It is not yet clear if this trend is applicable
to other countries, but if it appears elsewhere, it could mean new competition
in the race for skilled workers (see Issue #2: The Recession-Proof Race for Highly Skilled Migrants).
Back to the top
|
|
Press
Room
Need an interview?
Go straight to The Source. |
Archives
Missed a story?
Find it here. |
Links
External resources
and data sites. |
Site
Map
Find your way to the news you need. |
Copyright @
2009 Migration Policy Institute.
All rights reserved.
MPI · 1400 16th St. NW, Suite 300 · Washington, DC 20036
ph: (001) 202-266-1940 · fax: (001) 202-266-1900
source@migrationpolicy.org
|
|
 |
